Comment
Above in this comment thread:
Policy and Rule Discussions: 2004/02 - 2005/04 » Adding new Species'?
Comment
Above in this comment thread:
Policy and Rule Discussions: 2004/02 - 2005/04 » Adding new Species'?
|
|
We've already got hamsters and monitor lizards. Brian Jacques has the freedom to do anything, as he's an author who controls what every beast does.
The criteria for adding a beast is really "Will it help the MU?" Having a sudden flood of wolverines doesn't seem like a real benefit.
We used to have reptiles. We still have some. They are simply really hard to involve in RP. Some, such as Naco, managed it. Make a lizard and call it whichever sub-genre you like. Snakes, though, we tried and they didnt' work out.
Comment
Canada and North America? I was wondering what he meant when he said how far North and across the great sea Gulo's native land was.
Posted by: rockfire at 2005-03-10Also, I agree! A sudden flood of wolverine's would be bad news, especially for my village as poor as it is.
Replies to this comment
Comment
other species
Posted by: dswish2 at 2005-04-11I also agree that would not be good. Couldn't we make it where ther'es only a few wolverines though? Plus maybe we could add animals that you wouldn't run into very often because of there habitat or that there always hiding.